GGBA joins lawsuit to protect swallows

By Ilana DeBare

Last month we wrote about the Caltrans netting on a Petaluma bridge construction site that was trapping and killing dozens of Cliff Swallows.

Many Golden Gate Bird Alliance members — as well as other conservation groups — wrote to Caltrans asking it  to adopt less lethal methods of keeping birds from nesting on the bridge during construction. But Caltrans hasn’t listened, and insists that the problem is “solved” even while birds continue to be trapped.

So on Friday, GGBA joined a lawsuit against Caltrans filed by Native Songbird Care & Conservation, the Center for Biological Diversity and several other groups (including Marin and Madrone Audubon).

A lawsuit is a blunt, costly instrument. But sometimes it’s necessary when government officials refuse to listen to the public and take reasonable steps to protect wildlife and comply with environmental laws. This is one of those cases.

The press release about the lawsuit is below. Thanks to all of you who sent letters to Caltrans! (Even if Caltrans didn’t listen.) If you’d like to support us in this next step, we are accepting donations to help cover our legal costs in this suit. Click here to donate, and in the comment box on the donation page, write “Petaluma swallows.”

Swallows trapped in Caltrans netting / Photo courtesy of Native Songbird Care & Conservation

————————

Lawsuit Against Highway Agencies Targets Deaths of Migratory Swallows

Deadly Netting in Petaluma Has Killed, Injured More than 100 Swallows

SAN FRANCISCO – Conservation and animal protection groups filed a lawsuit Friday against the California Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration for causing and allowing the deaths of migratory cliff swallows nesting under bridges at a highway widening project in Petaluma, Calif. The agencies refuse to remove deadly netting installed at bridge overpasses as part of a Caltrans highway widening project along Highway 101 in the Marin-Sonoma Narrows. The netting has killed and injured more than 100 swallows in a one-month period.

“Incompetence and indifference by Caltrans is killing swallows that have just travelled 6,000 miles to return to a traditional nesting site, which the agency should have known about,” said Jeff Miller, a conservation advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity. “Caltrans continues to say the problem is fixed, but the netting is ineffective and deadly. There are better ways to discourage birds from nesting at a construction site.”

The entrapment and killing of swallows violates the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and National Environmental Policy Act. The Animal Legal Defense Fund filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity, Golden Gate Bird Alliance, Madrone Audubon Society, Marin Audubon Society and Native Songbird Care and Conservation. The Washington, D.C. law firm Meyer, Glitzenstein & Crystal is assisting in the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in the Northern District of California.

“Cliff swallows are protected by a nearly century-old federal law, and the Animal Legal Defense Fund is outraged by this cruelty to animals in our own backyard,” said Stephen Wells, executive director of the Cotati-based Animal Legal Defense Fund. “These agencies must find ways to build roads without resorting to deadly netting.”

“The netting is the wrong material in the wrong environment,” said Veronica Bowers, director of Native Songbird Care and Conservation. “Caltrans’ neglect has caused the senseless death of scores of swallows. Their refusal to remove the netting is shameful.”

“The point of an environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act is to identify potential impacts of a project, so how did Caltrans and federal agencies fail to identify the bridge locations as significant cliff swallow nesting sites and why did they install inadequate exclusion measures,” asked Susan Kirks, President of Madrone Audubon Society. “Caltrans blundering forward with attempted repairs and construction is encroaching on established swallow nests during their brief nesting season.”

Background

Every spring the highly social, wide-roaming cliff swallows travel thousands of miles from South America to return to their nesting sites in the Petaluma area. These swallows nest on bridges and other human infrastructure as well as rocky cliffs and foothills.

A contractor for Caltrans installed exclusionary netting in February, and the agencies knew by late March that the netting was trapping, maiming and killing swallows returning to nest. Although exclusion of nesting birds is permitted by regulatory agencies and is often standard procedure for such construction projects, the netting is ineffective at this location, was sloppily installed and is loosened by high winds. The netting has not prevented swallows from attempting to nest on the bridges. Under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act it is “unlawful at any time, by any means or in any manner” to capture or kill any migratory bird.

A coalition of more than two-dozen conservation and community organizations around California have joined together to take on fiscally irresponsible and environmentally damaging highway-widening projects throughout the state by Caltrans. The coalition cites wasteful spending, institutionalized disregard of environmental regulations designed to protect natural resources, and a pattern of refusal to address local community concerns. Groups in the Caltrans Watch coalition have filed litigation challenging the controversial $210 million Willits Bypass project along Highway 101 in Mendocino County, the $10 million project to widen and realign Highway 101 through ancient redwood trees in Richardson Grove State Park in Humboldt County, the $19 million Highway 197/199 widening projects in Del Norte County along the “wild and scenic” Smith River to accommodate oversized commercial trucks, and the $76 million Niles Canyon highway-widening project in Alameda County.